返回 2026-09-29 编辑版
发现与解读中文优先 · EN 原文AI 模型

GPT-6.1 Sol 在仅仅 7 天后取代 GPT-6 Sol,具有接近 Astra 的智能

GPT-6.1 Sol 在仅 7 天后取代了 GPT-6 Sol。它在智力指数上比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分,但每任务成本不到其四分之一

查看英文原文

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days. It scores 1 point below GPT-6 Astra in the Intelligence Index at less than one quarter of the Cost per Task

前沿能力继续下沉:通用模型压低成本,表格模型转向零训练推理

为什么值得看

模型竞争正在从单一能力榜单转向单位任务成本与任务专用推理方式。产品选型需要同时比较能力、价格、失败模式和是否仍需训练流水线。

最强反方

GPT-6.1 Sol 的指数来自第三方平台,Sonnet 5.5 是少量实测,Kumo 的准确率与效率由发布方报告;三者不能直接横向排名。

原始出现与传播对照

3 条出现 · AIHOT 精确重复

传播对照

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Sol,接替仅上线 7 天的 GPT-6 Sol,Artificial Analysis 智能指数比 GPT-6 Sol 高 4 分、比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分。

直接发布标题Artificial Analysis 完整文章(网页)打开该层出处 ↗

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

直接发布摘要Artificial Analysis 完整文章(网页)打开该层出处 ↗

OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Sol,接替仅上线 7 天的 GPT-6 Sol,Artificial Analysis 智能指数比 GPT-6 Sol 高 4 分、比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分。

来源
AIHOT 公开增量传播发现池 · aihot-control
证据角色
control_baseline
时间状态
known
用户判决
未判
查看该来源原文raw/aihot-control.json326186f13795ecd6a39b5ef3298c7eee4ceff257856dd579634271ec9d4ed9ed
发现与解读

GPT-6.1 Sol 在仅仅 7 天后取代 GPT-6 Sol,具有接近 Astra 的智能

GPT-6.1 Sol 在仅 7 天后取代了 GPT-6 Sol。它在智力指数上比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分,但每任务成本不到其四分之一

查看英文原文

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days. It scores 1 point below GPT-6 Astra in the Intelligence Index at less than one quarter of the Cost per Task

直接发布标题Artificial Analysis打开该层出处 ↗

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

直接发布摘要Artificial Analysis打开该层出处 ↗

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days. It scores 1 point below GPT-6 Astra in the Intelligence Index at less than one quarter of the Cost per Task

直接发布正文Artificial Analysis打开该层出处 ↗

Artificial AnalysisKAll articlesSeptember 29, 2026GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligenceSee model page GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days. It scores 1 point below GPT-6 Astra in the Intelligence Index at less than one quarter of the Cost per Task. Pricing matches GPT-6 Sol at $2/$10 per million input/output tokens, except that the cache read discount rises from 90% to 95%. GPT-6.1 Sol’s overall blended price for agentic workloads is therefore slightly lower than GPT-6 Sol. This represents an additional price cut, following GPT-6 Sol’s original 50% discount from GPT-5.6 Sol. Key takeaways: ➤ Achieves near-Astra Intelligence: GPT-6.1 Sol gains 4 points in the Intelligence Index vs GPT-6 Sol, and 5 points vs GPT-5.6 Sol - landing 1 point below GPT-6 Astra. It makes significant gains in agentic knowledge work, improving 4 points and 5 points in AA-Briefcase v1.1 and GDPval-AA v2.1 respectively. Other notable gains include a 12 point jump in Terminal-Bench 4.0, a 5 point jump in Humanity’s Last Exam, a 6 point jump in GDP.pdf, and an 8 point jump in AA-Omniscience Accuracy coupled with hallucination rate falling from 60% to 54%. ➤ Pushes cost efficiency frontier: At max effort, GPT-6.1 Sol costs less than a quarter of GPT-6 Astra per Intelligence Index task ($0.72 vs $3.26). It also costs 31% less per task than GPT-6 Sol ($1.05) and 64% less than GPT-5.6 Sol ($1.99). All effort levels of GPT-6.1 Sol push out the cost efficiency Pareto frontier: for a given level of intelligence, there is no cheaper model. ➤ Pushes token efficiency frontier, but uses slightly more output tokens than GPT-6 Sol: GPT-6.1 Sol uses ~10-30% more output tokens than GPT-6 Sol across effort levels. However, due to the increase in Intelligence Index score, its low and medium effort levels are Pareto optimal for token efficiency. ➤ Gains in Coding Agent Index: GPT-6.1 Sol gains 3 points on GPT-6 Sol at max effort in the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, and sits 2 points below GPT-6 Astra. Coding Agent Index GPT-6.1 Sol dominates the lower-price range of the Pareto frontier for Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs Cost per Task. GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh) scores 1 point above GPT-6 Astra for less than 15% of the Cost per Task. This represents a 6 point gain from GPT-6 Sol (max). We observed the xhigh effort setting to outperform the max effort setting by 3 points. Token efficiency GPT-6.1 Sol uses 10-30% more output tokens than GPT-6 Sol across effort settings in the Intelligence Index. However, due to increases in intelligence, its low and medium effort settings are Pareto optimal for token efficiency. AA-Omniscience At max effort, GPT-6.1 Sol jumps 8 points in AA-Omniscience Accuracy coupled with a 6 point reduction in hallucination rate. AA-Briefcase GPT-6.1 Sol improves by ~80 Elo in AA-Briefcase. This is driven by increases in its rubric score and Analytical Quality Elo, while Presentation Elo falls slightly. Results by evaluation Breakdown of the individual evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2. Compare GPT-6.1 Sol with other leading models at: artificialanalysis.ai/models/releases/gpt-6-1-solRead the latestAnnouncing the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index AllianceThe Artificial Analysis Cyber Index Alliance brings together industry partners to set a new standard for evaluating how AI models perform on enterprise cyber defense tasks. The Alliance launches alongside the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index, which combines three partner-contributed and open benchmarks to evaluate how well agents find and fix vulnerabilities.September 28, 2026Claude Sonnet 5.5 reaches #2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexAnthropic's new Sonnet model scores 56, just 2 points behind Opus 5.5 (max), but at the highest Output Tokens per Task we have measuredSeptember 28, 2026GPT-6 Sol and Luna push the cost efficiency frontierGPT-6 Sol and Luna push the cost efficiency frontier by halving cost relative to GPT-5.6 Sol and Luna. Intelligence Index and Coding Agent Index scores remain level with GPT-5.6, with progress in some evaluations and regressions in othersSeptember 22, 2026

回溯原始标题打开该层出处 ↗

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

回溯原始摘要打开该层出处 ↗

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days. It scores 1 point below GPT-6 Astra in the Intelligence Index at less than one quarter of the Cost per Task

来源
AIHOT 回溯原始页 · aihot-original
证据角色
independent_original_retrieval
时间状态
known
用户判决
未判
查看该来源原文raw/aihot-original-019783f2e61cba555146.htmlce59be11de229f2a4675dba28b94f36f14d6e38396e5962a33eb32fe4aff16f9
传播对照

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Sol,接替仅上线 7 天的 GPT-6 Sol,Artificial Analysis 智能指数比 GPT-6 Sol 高 4 分、比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分。

直接发布标题Artificial Analysis 完整文章(网页)打开该层出处 ↗

GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligence

直接发布摘要Artificial Analysis 完整文章(网页)打开该层出处 ↗

OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Sol,接替仅上线 7 天的 GPT-6 Sol,Artificial Analysis 智能指数比 GPT-6 Sol 高 4 分、比 GPT-6 Astra 低 1 分。

来源
AIHOT 编辑精选增量发现池 · aihot-selected
证据角色
selected_discovery
时间状态
known
用户判决
未判
查看该来源原文raw/aihot-selected.json18822f0a1df41b1d7ead1e659d83851216b307ca8d9aad18e17449abef5cedb5
Cluster IDevt_66820879ef85f763e6ae55f0精确去重依据resolved_original_url事件状态未判