返回 2026-08-20 编辑版
发现与解读中文优先 · EN 原文待分类

Nathan Lambert 发布:用 RAM 分数观察开放模型相对采用

我认为 RAM 分数 @xeophon 和我为 ATOM 工作制作的分数是一个非常可靠的指标。如果我只是根据我们的工件管理中 30 天的最高 RAM 分数进行排名,那么所有模型都非常可靠。 RAM 分数 @ t=(模型的累积下载量)@ t /(尺寸类别的前 10 个下载量)@ t RAM 实质上是查看模型在特定时间点(本例 t 为 30 天)的下载量,相对于该尺寸范围内所有时间段前 10 个模型的下载量。得分高于 1 意味着它有望成为该尺寸类别中下载量排名前 10 的模型。我认为对于 50B+ 型号最有意义。在 HuggingFace 上,单独的下载量通常并不好,但大型 MoE 在没有成为可靠模型的情况下获得大量采用的情况很少见。

查看英文原文

I think the RAM score @xeophon and I made for ATOM work is a really solid metric. If I just rank by the top RAM scores @ 30days within our artifacts curation, all the models are really solid. RAM score @ t= (model's cumulative downloads) @ t / (top-10 downloads for size class) @ t RAM is essentially looking at a model's downloads at specific points in time (this case t is 30 days), relative to the downloads of the top 10 models of all time in that size bracket. A score of above 1 means it's on track to be a top 10 downloaded model at that size category. Imo most meaningful for 50B+ models. Downloads alone normally isn't great on HuggingFace, but it's rare a large MoE gets a ton of adoption without being a solid model.

I think the RAM score @xeophon and I made for ATOM work is a really solid metric. If I just rank by the top RAM scores @ 30days within our artifacts curation, all the models are really solid. RAM score @ t= (model's cumulative downloads) @ t / (top-10 downloads for size class) @ t RAM is essentially looking at a model's downloads at specific points in time (this case t is 30 days), relative to the downloads of the top 10 models of all time in that size bracket. A score of above 1 means it's on track to be a top 10 downloaded model at that size category. Imo most meaningful for 50B+ models. Downloads alone normally isn't great on HuggingFace, but it's rare a large MoE gets a ton of adoption without being a solid model.

模型判断开始把资产供给、平台采用与社区热度放在同一张图上

为什么值得看

模型页、趋势榜和平台采用各自只说明一部分事实。把可下载资产、平台内使用和相对下载指标并列,能减少用单一榜单替代产品判断的风险。

最强反方

OpenRouter、RAM 与 Hugging Face 都是平台内代理指标;当日没有统一任务、硬件和生产负载下的质量或成本对比。

原始出现与传播对照

1 条出现 · 本次 AIHOT 未精确命中

发现与解读

我认为 RAM 分数 @xeophon 和我为 ATOM 工作制作的分数是一个非常可靠的指标。

我认为 RAM 分数 @xeophon 和我为 ATOM 工作制作的分数是一个非常可靠的指标。如果我只是根据我们的工件管理中 30 天的最高 RAM 分数进行排名,那么所有模型都非常可靠。 RAM 分数 @ t=(模型的累积下载量)@ t /(尺寸类别的前 10 个下载量)@ t RAM 实质上是查看模型在特定时间点(本例 t 为 30 天)的下载量,相对于该尺寸范围内所有时间段前 10 个模型的下载量。得分高于 1 意味着它有望成为该尺寸类别中下载量排名前 10 的模型。我认为对于 50B+ 型号最有意义。在 HuggingFace 上,单独的下载量通常并不好,但大型 MoE 在没有成为可靠模型的情况下获得大量采用的情况很少见。

查看英文原文

I think the RAM score @xeophon and I made for ATOM work is a really solid metric. If I just rank by the top RAM scores @ 30days within our artifacts curation, all the models are really solid. RAM score @ t= (model's cumulative downloads) @ t / (top-10 downloads for size class) @ t RAM is essentially looking at a model's downloads at specific points in time (this case t is 30 days), relative to the downloads of the top 10 models of all time in that size bracket. A score of above 1 means it's on track to be a top 10 downloaded model at that size category. Imo most meaningful for 50B+ models. Downloads alone normally isn't great on HuggingFace, but it's rare a large MoE gets a ton of adoption without being a solid model.

I think the RAM score @xeophon and I made for ATOM work is a really solid metric. If I just rank by the top RAM scores @ 30days within our artifacts curation, all the models are really solid. RAM score @ t= (model's cumulative downloads) @ t / (top-10 downloads for size class) @ t RAM is essentially looking at a model's downloads at specific points in time (this case t is 30 days), relative to the downloads of the top 10 models of all time in that size bracket. A score of above 1 means it's on track to be a top 10 downloaded model at that size category. Imo most meaningful for 50B+ models. Downloads alone normally isn't great on HuggingFace, but it's rare a large MoE gets a ton of adoption without being a solid model.

直接发布标题Nathan Lambert@natolambert打开该层出处 ↗

I think the RAM score @xeophon and I made for ATOM work is a really solid metric. If I just rank by the top RAM scores @ 30days within our artifacts curation, all the models are really solid. RAM score @ t= (model's cumulative downloads) @ t / (top-10 downloads for size class) @ t RAM is essentially looking at a model's downloads at specific points in time (this case t is 30 days), relative to the downloads of the top 10 models of all time in that size bracket. A score of above 1 means it's on track to be a top 10 downloaded model at that size category. Imo most meaningful for 50B+ models. Downloads alone normally isn't great on HuggingFace, but it's rare a large MoE gets a ton of adoption without being a solid model.

来源
X @natolambert · x-natolambert
证据角色
x_open_model_network
时间状态
known
用户判决
未判
查看该来源原文raw/x-natolambert.jsonf2b00ba8f0e6ea1bf2526ef6f86572b66a2625b3d364f9d84b142c0ad562c56c
Cluster IDevt_4bb558cd1fb6eda6c8230756精确去重依据canonical_url事件状态未判